(Long Past) Time for a financial transaction tax
Katrina vanden Heuvel
@ WaPo:
(A)fter years of Wall Street excess, and at a moment when new
revenues are badly needed, the time has surely come for a financial
transaction tax .
Indeed, support for such a tax has never been
stronger — or broader. Many on the progressive left have long favored it
. Now, though, another group of bleeding-heart liberals, otherwise
known as the American people, is on board. When it comes to cutting the
deficit, 6 in 10 Americans prefer taxing the financial industry to
cutting social spending.
But this idea doesn’t just have the
masses on its side; it has the elites, and even some Republican elites.
Once championed by the granddaddy of liberal economics, John Maynard
Keynes, the banner of a financial transactions tax has been picked up
by conservative economists including Sheila Bair, George W. Bush’s appointee to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
After all, the tax isn’t just a good revenue raiser. It’s smart regulatory reform.
The
high-frequency traders that now dominate our markets would be
hardest-hit by the tax. A top economist recently concluded that their
lightning speed, algorithm-driven trading drains profits from
traditional investors. And analysts fear that such mass trading strategies could lead to disaster if markets behave unexpectedly.
The new tax would discourage these kinds of trades, which would be a good thing.
Europe,
at least, seems to agree. Eleven nations, led by the conservative
German government, are on track to start collecting the tax by January
2014. Expected revenues: $50 billion per year.
Honestly, I think it's a bad idea. It is a rare case where I think a genuine argument can be made by the investment industry that it works against efficiency. I think are stronger (but ironically simpler) financial regulations championed by Warren and doubling the capital gains tax are more thoughtful and fair remedies that would accomplish the same ends.
ReplyDelete